Evolutionary history in a tiny package
If you can see this text instead of a movie, you need to install Adobe's Flash Player (go to www.adobe.com).
Evolutionary theory helps us better understand the two central points of this discovery: first, that the lizards actually represent new species, and second, their unusually small size. While it might seem that the discovery of a new species would be cut and dried, that's not always the case. Species are typically defined as populations that actually or potentially interbreed in nature. To claim that an organism represents a new species, biologists must provide evidence that supports that idea. The new chameleons looked somewhat different from known species and from one another (different body sizes, different length tails, etc.), but of course, some organisms can look quite different from one another and still interbreed for example, juveniles, males, and females of the same species often have very different appearances. How do we know when an unfamiliar-looking organism is actually a new species?
To help determine whether the chameleons constituted new species, a team of biologists reconstructed their evolutionary history. They sampled the DNA of the new chameleons, compared it to the genetic sequences of similar, known species, and used this information to figure out how all those chameleons are related. If the newly discovered animals are indeed new and distinct species and don't interbreed with one another or with known species, then we'd expect them each to occupy their own twig of the tree of life. And that's exactly what the reconstructed evolutionary tree showed. On the tree below, you can see that individuals of the four new species (Brookesia confidens, B. micra, B. tristis, and B. desperata) are all most closely related to other individuals of that species and that they form clades distinct from previously known species.
You can also see from the phylogeny above that one of the newly discovered chameleons, B. micra, is the tiniest of the bunch. In fact, B. micra seems to be one of the very smallest vertebrates on Earth after some frogs and possibly a dwarf gecko. How did this species (and all the chameleons of the Brookesia clade) wind up so small? Again, evolution helps provide the answer ...
Evolutionary biologists have noticed an interesting pattern among organisms that immigrate from a large land mass to an island. Many evolve into miniaturized forms a phenomenon known as island dwarfism or insular dwarfism. For example, 11,000 years ago, dwarf elephants and hippopotamuses the size of large pigs lived on the island of Cyprus. In such cases, island living seems to have fostered the evolution of small body sizes. However, this pattern doesn't hold for all organisms: some clades have a tendency to evolve larger body sizes (e.g., common rats and mice, as evidenced by the foot and a half long rats found on the island of Flores), some have a tendency to evolve smaller body sizes (many ungulates), and some don't change much at all. Why are dwarf forms sometimes more likely to evolve on islands and sometimes not?
It is unclear whether the tiny new chameleon species (which are predators insect-eaters) represent a case of island dwarfism. They are certainly smaller than their mainland counterparts; however, the patterns and processes of this evolution are not obvious. Interestingly, if island dwarfism is a factor in their small body sizes, the smallest of the small, B. micra, may represent a case of double island dwarfism. This species inhabits a tiny island off the coast of Madagascar called Nosy Hara so it is possible that the ancestors of the Brookesia chameleons immigrated to Madagascar and evolved small body sizes, and that then the ancestors of B. micra immigrated from Madagascar to Nosy Hara and evolved an even smaller body size! More research will help clarify the evolutionary trajectory of these species.
Unfortunately, time to do that research may be running out. Madagascar has suffered large-scale deforestation, and while recent conservation efforts on the island aim to provide sanctuary for some species, many others have been lost to extinction. The names given to several of the new chameleon species reflect their uncertain future. B. tristis (which means "sorrowful") and B. desperatus (which means "desperate") were so named because, despite living in areas currently designated as nature reserves, both are threatened by severe habitat destruction.
Discussion and extension questions
View this article online at:
Chameleon photo is from Glaw, F., Köhler, J., Townsend, T. M., and Vences, M. (2012). Rivaling the world's smallest reptile: discovery of miniaturized and microendemic new species of leaf chameleons (Brookesia) from northern Madagascar. PLoS ONE. 7: e31314.
Understanding Evolution © 2016 by The University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, and the Regents of the University of California