| Home > | History of Evolutionary Thought |
|
|||
|
|
|||||
Genetic Similarities: Wilson, Sarich, Sibley, & Ahlquist (1 of 3) |
|||||||||
|
|
To investigate how birds are related to one another, a biologist of the 1950s would have carefully studied their anatomical similarities and differences. But today, a scientist working on the same problem could also use the very instructions from which that anatomy was built: its genetic code. DNA sequences form the hereditary links between generations, so it is no surprise that scientists investigating evolutionary relationships have sought to get closer and closer to the DNA that underlies those relationships. However, reading the genomes of entire organisms did not fall immediately from the discovery of DNA in the 1950s. In small steps, scientists came closer to their target. Scientists first began to zoom in on gene sequences by studying the products of DNA: proteins. After all, if two species are closely related, they should have similar gene sequences, which should then make similar proteins. So before the 1970s, proteins were used as stand-ins for genes in studying evolution.
Testing Similarity Using Antibodies
|
||||||||
|
Sarich image courtesy of UC Department of
Anthropology, Berkeley. |
next page |
||||||||
|
Search · Site Index · Navigation · Copyright · Credits · Contact Understanding Evolution For Teachers Home · Understanding Evolution Home Read how others have recognized the Understanding Evolution website Spanish translation of Understanding Evolution For Teachers from the Spanish Society of Evolutionary Biology. |