III. Uncultivated Microbial Eukaryotes
What is the extent of eukaryotic diversity?
How do we find life on Earth? Why should we
care? Well, in terms of studying evolution, our knowledge of modern
eukaryotes informs our knowledge of their evolution. An incomplete
understanding of diversity of today's eukaryotes results in
incomplete evolutionary trees.
Characteristics of eukaryotes that live without oxygen
Most known anaerobic protists are pathogens. One could argue that the only
reason we know about the ones we do is becuase they affect us they
cause disease. Anaerobic protists have evolved multiple times (which
is termed "polyphyletic") but since the most basal eukaryotes
are anaerobes, we believe the original eukaryotic cell evolved in an
anoxic world. How might we look for eukaryotes still alive today,
which might be more genetically closer to those ancestral types, than
to more recently evolved groups like us?
Identifying protists by microscopy
One way we could do this would be by microscopy. Antoine van
Leeuwenhoek, a lay person (not a card-carrying scientist), really began the study of microbiology in the 17th century with the use of one of the first microscopes. van Leewenhoek described the first microorganisms he called them "animalcules."
People still identify microbes based solely on microscopic descriptions today. These descriptions can read like field guides. Though our microscopes have gotten a lot more sophisticated since van Leewenhoek (e.g., electron microscopes), are
there other ways to find these relict eukaryotes?
Identifying protists by cultivation
Well, we could grow them. We know Louis Pasteur for a lot of work with
microbiology, such as germ theory and pasteurization. But he
was also the first to describe organisms which were able to grow in
sealed flasks without "air." This was truly a first, as people at
that time believed that all organisms needed air, meaning oxygen, to
grow.
But we encounter problems when we rely only on
visualizing or growing organisms in order to identify them. First and
foremost, it can be really hard! Think if we had to grow every animal
in the zoo or every plant in the forest in order to know they were
there. Plus, we don't do a really good job at growing most microbes.
It's estimated that only about 1% of all microbes in the natural
world have been grown. Fortunately, there's a better way to
identify organisms not by how they look or how they grow,
but by their DNA.
Identifying protists by their genotype
DNA. We hear a lot about DNA, the genetic
material of all organisms is always in the news. You've probably
heard about DNA fingerprinting to identify suspects in crimes, or
prove paternity. Well, this method of DNA fingerprinting has been
used extensively in the past 15 years or so to identify uncultivated
bacteria and archaea. And, using these new molecular techniques,
we've discovered that the microbial diversity of bacteria and archaea
has been grossly underestimated. Our study, and the rest of the work
I'll present today is the first to look for uncultivated microbial
eukaryotes, or protists, by their DNA fingerprints. How do we do
this?
A tablespoon of mud
We start with about a tablespoon of mud remember that this can contain
several billion microbes. This is mud from Berkeley Aquatic Park. Then we extract the DNA from the mud. By the way, the black color of the mud is a good indicator
that there is no oxygen at that layer. Reduced iron complexed with
sulfur produces something called pyrite a dark black
precipitate.
|
Xeroxing DNA
The polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, is
basically a way to xerox DNA so that we have enough to work with in
the lab. Many microbes are rare and we need to amplify their DNA
signals to be able to find them. In our work we're xeroxing a
specific gene the gene for rRNA. Remember this is what Carl Woese
used to relate different microbes to each other and construct a tree
of life.
Patterns in DNA
Once we amplify rRNA genes from a given
environmental sample, we need to sort them by type. One tablespoon of
mud could have several billion microbes, perhaps representing 1,000 different
types! To categorize these different types, we use a technique called
RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) which generates
unique patterns or fingerprints corresponding to unique organisms.
At right is an example showing the DNA fingerprints of the different types of
sequences (organisms) we find. Notice the different banding
patterns.
Aligning genes
Once we get the DNA sequence, we line up the
sequences and compare them to known organisms. The rows correspond to an
rRNA sequence from a particular organism; the column relates the exact
nucleotide (A,T,C,G) at a specific position in the sequence of the
gene. Note the conserved/variable regions.
Constructing a phylogenetic tree
Then,
from this alignment of DNA rRNA sequences, we use computer models to
simulate the evolution of sequences. We infer that the evolution of
the sequences corresponds to the evolution of the organisms. In this
way, we are able to determine evolutionary relationships among the
new uncultivated microbes. Unlike Linneaus, Darwin or Haeckel, we
organize geneologies based on genotype, not phenotype. This also
gives us a picture of evolution. Note the organisms in blue those
we only know from environmental sequences or fingerprints. Also note
how we can compare where they fall on the tree to known organisms. OK, let's talk more about our study of creatures from the Black Lagoon.
|