• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Image & Use Policy
  • Translations
  • Glossary

SUPPORT UE

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

UC MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY

UC Berkeley logoUC Berkeley

Understanding Evolution

Understanding Evolution

Your one-stop source for information on evolution

Understanding Evolution

  • Home
  • Evolution 101
    • An introduction to evolution: what is evolution and how does it work?
      • 1_historyoflife_menu_iconThe history of life: looking at the patterns – Change over time and shared ancestors
      • 2_mechanisms_menu_iconMechanisms: the processes of evolution – Selection, mutation, migration, and more
      • 3_microevo_menu_iconMicroevolution – Evolution within a population
      • 4_speciation_menu_iconSpeciation – How new species arise
      • 5_macroevo_menu_iconMacroevolution – Evolution above the species level
      • 6_bigissues_menu_iconThe big issues – Pacing, diversity, complexity, and trends
  • Teach Evolution
    • Lessons and teaching tools
      • Teaching Resources
      • Image Library
      • Using research profiles with students
      • Active-learning slides for instruction
      • Using Evo in the News with students
      • Guide to Evo 101 and Digging Data
    • Conceptual framework
      • Alignment with the Next Generation Science Standards
      • teach-evo-menu-icon
    • Teaching guides
      • K-2 teaching guide
      • 3-5 teaching guide
      • 6-8 teaching guide
      • 9-12 teaching guide
      • Undergraduate teaching guide

    • Misconceptions about evolution

    • Dealing with objections to evolution
      • Information on controversies in the public arena relating to evolution
  • Learn Evolution

Home → Switching to phylogenetics
  • ES en Español

Switching to phylogenetics

The system of phylogenetic classification works differently than the traditional system.

I. Looking at rank

Phylogenetic classification has two main advantages over the Linnaean system. First, phylogenetic classification tells you something important about the organism: its evolutionary history. Second, phylogenetic classification does not attempt to “rank” organisms. On the other hand, the Linnaean classification “ranks” groups of organisms artificially into kingdoms, phyla, orders, etc. This can be misleading as it seems to suggest, for example, that a cat family is somehow comparable to an orchid family. However, they are not comparable:

  • One may have a longer history than the other. The first representatives of the cat family Felidae probably lived about 30 million years ago, while the first orchids may have lived more than 100 million years ago.
  • They may have a different level of diversity. There are about 35 cat species and 20,000 orchid species.
  • They may have different degrees of biological differentiation. Many orchids belonging to different genera are able to hybridize. But the same is not true of cats — house cats (belonging to the genus Felis) and lions (belonging to the genus Panthera) cannot form hybrids.
Laelia (left) Cattleya (right) Orchids of these two different genera hybridize. Orchid images © Greg Allikas.
Felis (left) Panthera (right) …but cats of these two different genera do not. House cat image courtesy of Judy Scotchmoor, UCMP; Lion image courtesy of Gerald and Buff Corsi © California Academy of Sciences.

There is just no reason to think that any two identically ranked groups are comparable and by suggesting that they are, the Linnaean system is misleading.

II. Looking at names

Biologists deal with phylogenetic classification by de-emphasizing ranks and by reassigning names so that they are only applied to clades. This means that your use of biological names doesn’t have to change very much. In many cases, the Linnaean names are perfectly good in the phylogenetic system. For example, Aves, which is the class of birds in the Linnaean system, is also used as a phylogenetic name, since birds form a clade (right).

Most of the specific names that you are accustomed to using (e.g., Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster) have not changed at all with the rise of phylogenetic classification.

However, there are some names from Linnaean classification that do NOT work in a phylogenetic classification. For example, the reptiles do not form a clade — unless you count birds too.

As typically conceived, the group Reptiles does not form a clade, so this is not a valid phylogenetic name. However, if birds are included, Reptilia is a valid phylogenetic name.
  • More Details
  • Evo Examples
  • Teaching Resources

Read more about how classification factored into the history of evolutionary thought.

Learn more about phylogenetic classification in context:

  • Using trees to understand plants: The work of Chelsea Specht, a research profile.
  • The new shrew that's not, a news brief with discussion questions.
  • Teach your students about phylogenetic classification with Classification and evolution, a classroom activity for grades 9-12.
  • Find additional lessons, activities, videos, and articles that focus on phylogenetic classification.

Footer

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe to our newsletter

Teach

  • Teaching resource database
  • Correcting misconceptions
  • Conceptual framework and NGSS alignment
  • Image and use policy

Learn

  • Evo 101
  • Evo in the News
  • The Tree Room
  • Browse learning resources
  • Glossary

Copyright © 2023 · UC Museum of Paleontology Understanding Evolution · Privacy Policy