• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Image & Use Policy
  • Translations
  • Glossary

SUPPORT UE

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

UC MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY

UC Berkeley logoUC Berkeley

Understanding Evolution

Understanding Evolution

Your one-stop source for information on evolution

Understanding Evolution

  • Home
  • Evolution 101
    • An introduction to evolution: what is evolution and how does it work?
      • 1_historyoflife_menu_iconThe history of life: looking at the patterns – Change over time and shared ancestors
      • 2_mechanisms_menu_iconMechanisms: the processes of evolution – Selection, mutation, migration, and more
      • 3_microevo_menu_iconMicroevolution – Evolution within a population
      • 4_speciation_menu_iconSpeciation – How new species arise
      • 5_macroevo_menu_iconMacroevolution – Evolution above the species level
      • 6_bigissues_menu_iconThe big issues – Pacing, diversity, complexity, and trends
  • Teach Evolution
    • Lessons and teaching tools
      • Teaching Resources
      • Image Library
      • Using research profiles with students
      • Active-learning slides for instruction
      • Using Evo in the News with students
      • Guide to Evo 101 and Digging Data
    • Conceptual framework
      • Alignment with the Next Generation Science Standards
      • teach-evo-menu-icon
    • Teaching guides
      • K-2 teaching guide
      • 3-5 teaching guide
      • 6-8 teaching guide
      • 9-12 teaching guide
      • Undergraduate teaching guide

    • Misconceptions about evolution

    • Dealing with objections to evolution
      • Information on controversies in the public arena relating to evolution
  • Learn Evolution

Home → When sexual selection runs away
  • ES en Español

When sexual selection runs away

The concept of runaway sexual selection illustrates one of the ways that sexual selection is hypothesized to work. Runaway sexual selection can help explain how traits that are appealing to members of the opposite sex, but pose a risk in terms of survival, can evolve – and how that preference could evolve in the first place.

The quandary of female choice

It makes sense for a female to choose a mate based on traits that help him survive. For example, a female bird would do well to choose a strong-looking, disease-free mate. That male likely carries “good” genes that allow him to resist disease and get sufficient food — and he will pass those genes on to his offspring.

Male peacock with feathers spread in a fan behind it.
Peacock photo courtesy of Rock Maple Farm.

However, there are many examples of females choosing mates based on less useful traits (e.g., song complexity) or even traits detrimental to survival (e.g., brightly colored plumage, as in the case of the peacock). These cases present evolutionary biologists with a bit of a puzzle. How did these preferences arise in the first place? If a female chooses a male with bright feathers, her sons will have bright feathers, which are likely to attract predators. A gene for choosing brightly colored males would seem to be disadvantageous. How do such genes spread through a population?

There are several possible answers to explain how these seemingly disadvantageous genes spread through the population, among them:

  • Runaway selection
    Imagine a bird population in which females choose mates at random. Males with slightly longer tails fly a little more adeptly, avoid predation, and so, survive better than males with slightly shorter tails. In this situation, a gene for female choosiness (longer tail = sexier) will be favored, since — by choosing a long-tailed male — she will have sons with longer tails. This trait will spread through the population until most males have long tails and most females prefer long-tailed mates. So far so good.

Graphic depicting tail length in birds increasing due to survival advantage and female choice over time.

However, once this has happened, the process may run out of control, until the male trait becomes so exaggerated that it is disadvantageous. In other words, female preference, instead of survival advantage, may begin to drive the evolution of ever-longer tails, until males are encumbered by showy plumage that no longer helps them avoid predation.

  • Good genes
    Imagine another bird population in which females choose mates at random. Some males in the population have better genes for survival than others, but it is difficult to tell whether a male has good genes or not. In this scenario, long tails make it more difficult to survive — they are costly to produce and maintain. Because they are so costly, only males with good genes have the extra resources to produce them. In this situation, a long tail is an indicator of good genes. A gene for female choosiness (longer tail = sexier) will be favored, since — by choosing a long-tailed/good gene male — she will have sons with good genes. This trait will spread through the population until most females choose long-tailed mates and males that are able to produce long tails are favored.

Table showing mail traits of long vs short tail and the genetic quality of those traits.

If females choose males with “long and costly” tails, they are guaranteed to get good genes! If they choose males with “short and cheap” tails, they may get good or bad genes.

  • Evo Examples

Learn more about sexual selection in context:

  • Survival of the sneakiest, a comic strip with discussion questions.
  • Evolution's dating and mating game, a news brief with discussion questions.
  • Quick evolution leads to quiet crickets, a news brief with discussion questions.

Footer

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe to our newsletter

Teach

  • Teaching resource database
  • Correcting misconceptions
  • Conceptual framework and NGSS alignment
  • Image and use policy

Learn

  • Evo 101
  • Evo in the News
  • The Tree Room
  • Browse learning resources
  • Glossary

Copyright © 2023 · UC Museum of Paleontology Understanding Evolution · Privacy Policy