• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Image & Use Policy
  • Translations
  • Glossary

SUPPORT UE

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

UC MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY

UC Berkeley logoUC Berkeley

Understanding Evolution

Understanding Evolution

Your one-stop source for information on evolution

Understanding Evolution

  • Home
  • Evolution 101
    • An introduction to evolution: what is evolution and how does it work?
      • 1_historyoflife_menu_iconThe history of life: looking at the patterns – Change over time and shared ancestors
      • 2_mechanisms_menu_iconMechanisms: the processes of evolution – Selection, mutation, migration, and more
      • 3_microevo_menu_iconMicroevolution – Evolution within a population
      • 4_speciation_menu_iconSpeciation – How new species arise
      • 5_macroevo_menu_iconMacroevolution – Evolution above the species level
      • 6_bigissues_menu_iconThe big issues – Pacing, diversity, complexity, and trends
  • Teach Evolution
    • Lessons and teaching tools
      • Teaching Resources
      • Image Library
      • Using research profiles with students
      • Active-learning slides for instruction
      • Using Evo in the News with students
      • Guide to Evo 101 and Digging Data
    • Conceptual framework
      • Alignment with the Next Generation Science Standards
      • teach-evo-menu-icon
    • Teaching guides
      • K-2 teaching guide
      • 3-5 teaching guide
      • 6-8 teaching guide
      • 9-12 teaching guide
      • Undergraduate teaching guide

    • Misconceptions about evolution

    • Dealing with objections to evolution
      • Information on controversies in the public arena relating to evolution
  • Learn Evolution

Home → Using parsimony
  • ES en Español

Using parsimony

After studying some major vertebrate lineages and limiting the data to characters that are likely homologous, you might end up with the following evidence (note that there are many vertebrate lineages and many characters excluded from this example for the sake of simplicity):

Character matrix of vertebrates, showing which lineages have vertebrae, bony skeleton, four limbs, amniotic egg, hair, and two post-orbital fenestrae.

From studying fossils and lineages closely related to the vertebrate clade, we hypothesize that the ancestor of vertebrates had none of these features:

To build a phylogenetic tree from these data, we must base our clades on shared derived characters — not shared ancestral characters. Since we have a good idea of what the ancestral characters are (see above), this is not so hard. We might start out by examining the egg character. We focus in on the group of lineages that share the derived form of this character, an amniotic egg (A, below), and hypothesize that they form a clade (B):

Vertebrate character matrix with lineages with amniotic egg circled. An evolutionary tree that shows those lineages with an amniotic egg forming a clade.

If we go through the whole table like this, grouping clades according to shared derived characters (C, below), we get the following hypothesis (D):

Matrix with synapomorphies circled. Phylogeny showing the clades that those synapomorphies delineate.

Of course, this was just an example of the tree-building process. Phylogenetic trees are generally based on many more characters and often involve more lineages. For example, biologists reconstructing relationships between 499 lineages of seed plants began with more than 1400 molecular characters!

What is parsimony?

The tree-building process explained above is based on the principle of parsimony. The parsimony principle is basic to all science and tells us to choose the simplest scientific explanation that fits the evidence. In terms of tree-building, that means that the best hypothesis is the one that requires the fewest evolutionary changes.

For example, we could compare these two hypotheses about vertebrate relationships using the parsimony principle:

Two vertebrate phylogenies, one in which a bony skeleton arises only once, and one in which it arises twice.

Hypothesis 1 requires six evolutionary changes and Hypothesis 2 requires seven evolutionary changes, with a bony skeleton evolving independently, twice. Although both fit the available data, the parsimony principle says that Hypothesis 1 is better — since it does not hypothesize unnecessarily complicated changes.

This principle was implicit in the tree-building process we went through earlier. However, in most cases, the data are more complex than those used in our example and may point to several different phylogenetic hypotheses. In those cases, the parsimony principle can help us choose between them.

  • Evo examples
  • Teaching resources

Learn about parsimony in context: Using trees to understand plants: The work of Chelsea Specht, a research profile.

Teach your students about evolutionary relationships and phylogenetics:

  • What did T. rex taste like?, a web activity for grades 6-12.

Find additional lessons, activities, videos, and articles that focus on phylogenetics.

Footer

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe to our newsletter

Teach

  • Teaching resource database
  • Correcting misconceptions
  • Conceptual framework and NGSS alignment
  • Image and use policy

Learn

  • Evo 101
  • Evo in the News
  • The Tree Room
  • Browse learning resources
  • Glossary

Copyright © 2025 · UC Museum of Paleontology Understanding Evolution · Privacy Policy

We use cookies to see how our website is performing. We do not collect or store your personal information, and we do not track your preferences or activity on this site.Ok