• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Image & Use Policy
  • Translations
  • Glossary

SUPPORT UE

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

UC MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY

UC Berkeley logoUC Berkeley

Understanding Evolution

Understanding Evolution

Your one-stop source for information on evolution

Understanding Evolution

  • Home
  • Evolution 101
    • An introduction to evolution: what is evolution and how does it work?
      • 1_historyoflife_menu_iconThe history of life: looking at the patterns – Change over time and shared ancestors
      • 2_mechanisms_menu_iconMechanisms: the processes of evolution – Selection, mutation, migration, and more
      • 3_microevo_menu_iconMicroevolution – Evolution within a population
      • 4_speciation_menu_iconSpeciation – How new species arise
      • 5_macroevo_menu_iconMacroevolution – Evolution above the species level
      • 6_bigissues_menu_iconThe big issues – Pacing, diversity, complexity, and trends
  • Teach Evolution
    • Lessons and teaching tools
      • Teaching Resources
      • Image Library
      • Using research profiles with students
      • Active-learning slides for instruction
      • Using Evo in the News with students
      • Guide to Evo 101 and Digging Data
    • Conceptual framework
      • Alignment with the Next Generation Science Standards
      • teach-evo-menu-icon
    • Teaching guides
      • K-2 teaching guide
      • 3-5 teaching guide
      • 6-8 teaching guide
      • 9-12 teaching guide
      • Undergraduate teaching guide

    • Misconceptions about evolution

    • Dealing with objections to evolution
      • Information on controversies in the public arena relating to evolution
  • Learn Evolution

Home → What causes evolutionary trends?
  • ES en Español

What causes evolutionary trends?

Science asks not only “what happened?” but also “what caused it to happen?” Upon observing an evolutionary trend, such as a particular lineage increasing in size, a scientist would naturally ask, “What’s going on here?” There are many possible explanations.

Hindsight

If we looked at the fossil record for the lineage leading to modern horses, we would see a trend towards increased size. Horse evolution is often depicted as a steady trend, as shown below.

Illustration depicting horse size increasing steadily over evolutionary time.

However, when we take note of all the related horse lineages (including extinct lineages), this “trend” begins to blur. Some horse lineages got bigger, some got smaller, some went back and forth. The commonly depicted trend toward increased size is not a general trend at all, but rather it is the result of people limiting their hindsight to the lineage of modern horses.

Graphs showing horse size over time steadily increases when you look at one lineage on the left and blurs when you look at all lineages on the right.

Functional or physical boundaries

If a lineage starts its evolution close to a limit (such as in size or complexity), we inevitably observe the trend of lineages moving away from that limit.

Graph showing trait value over time.

For example, several times during their evolutionary history, foraminiferans have been decimated by extinctions, leaving only a few, small-sized lineages as survivors. These lineages diversified into daughter lineages, most of which were larger than their parent lineage. They definitely experienced a trend towards a bigger average body size, but the trend may have been based on the fact that foraminiferans cannot get any smaller than they started out. They had nowhere to go but up!

Foraminiferan image of Globorotalia albeari
Foraminiferan image courtesy of the National Collection of Foraminifera © Smithsonian Institution.

Irreversibility

Graph showing trait value over time.

Some evolutionary changes may only be able to go in one direction, like a ratchet. For example, once an animal lineage emerges from the water and evolves the ability to breathe air, it seems to be very difficult for that lineage to revert to extracting oxygen from water. Several lineages have made the switch to air-breathing — the ancestors of terrestrial vertebrates, the ancestors of insects, and the ancestors of spiders, for example. However, no vertebrate, insect, or spider lineage has regained the ability to extract oxygen from water. Even though a few lineages have returned to leading aquatic lifestyles, these lineages still extract oxygen from air. This evolutionary ratchet produces a trend of more changes to air-breathing than away from it; once you’ve gone there, you can’t go back.

Natural selection

Graph showing trait value over time and that natural selection causes consistent change in one direction.

Natural selection can cause evolutionary changes in a lineage to be biased in a particular direction. Consider ammonites, a clade of extinct mollusks with intricate, many-chambered shells (much like their relative, the nautilus). As new ammonite lineages evolved, the way that these chambers fit together became increasingly complex. Evolutionary change in the direction of increasing complexity was consistent and may have been caused by natural selection which favored greater shell strength.

Illustration showing ammonite shell sutures trending towards greater complexity over time.

Species selection

Graph showing trait value over time, traits that increase speciation rates can produce a lop-sided phylogeny.

If a character causes a lineage to speciate more frequently, or go extinct less frequently, there will be a bias towards lineages that have that character. For example, some marine snail lineages exhibit an evolutionary trend: as time goes by, we see more and more lineages with direct development (meaning they do not go through a stage where their larvae swim around freely). Why might this be? If a lineage has direct development, its larvae don’t disperse very far—they stick close to home and are isolated from other populations. That means that if some directly-developing individuals somehow ended up in a new place, they probably would not get to reproduce with their parent population. In other words, having direct development might cause the lineage to get chopped up into isolated sub-groups—which might become reproductively isolated from one another. If direct development is indeed linked to increased speciation rates, over time, we’d expect to see more and more lineages with direct development: a trend!

Rejected explanations

Several explanations for trends have been rejected by scientists who have found no (or very little) evidence suggesting that these processes actually happen:

  • Internal drive towards complexity: All of the evidence we have so far is consistent with evolution resulting from the undirected interaction of organism with environment. There is no evidence to support a hypothesis of any sort of “internal force” governing evolutionary change and no evidence to support it.
  • Directional mutation: Mutation does not occur with a directed goal. Since mutation is random, it cannot explain trends.

 

  • More Details
  • Evo Examples

Read more about species selection and other levels of selection.

Learn more about evolutionary trends in context: Oxygen as an evolutionary constraint, a news brief with discussion questions.

Footer

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe to our newsletter

Teach

  • Teaching resource database
  • Correcting misconceptions
  • Conceptual framework and NGSS alignment
  • Image and use policy

Learn

  • Evo 101
  • Evo in the News
  • The Tree Room
  • Browse learning resources
  • Glossary

Copyright © 2025 · UC Museum of Paleontology Understanding Evolution · Privacy Policy

We use cookies to see how our website is performing. We do not collect or store your personal information, and we do not track your preferences or activity on this site.Ok