• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Image & Use Policy
  • Translations
  • Glossary

SUPPORT UE

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

UC MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY

UC Berkeley logoUC Berkeley

Understanding Evolution

Understanding Evolution

Your one-stop source for information on evolution

Understanding Evolution

  • Home
  • Evolution 101
    • An introduction to evolution: what is evolution and how does it work?
      • 1_historyoflife_menu_iconThe history of life: looking at the patterns – Change over time and shared ancestors
      • 2_mechanisms_menu_iconMechanisms: the processes of evolution – Selection, mutation, migration, and more
      • 3_microevo_menu_iconMicroevolution – Evolution within a population
      • 4_speciation_menu_iconSpeciation – How new species arise
      • 5_macroevo_menu_iconMacroevolution – Evolution above the species level
      • 6_bigissues_menu_iconThe big issues – Pacing, diversity, complexity, and trends
  • Teach Evolution
    • Lessons and teaching tools
      • Teaching Resources
      • Image Library
      • Using research profiles with students
      • Active-learning slides for instruction
      • Using Evo in the News with students
      • Guide to Evo 101 and Digging Data
    • Conceptual framework
      • Alignment with the Next Generation Science Standards
      • teach-evo-menu-icon
    • Teaching guides
      • K-2 teaching guide
      • 3-5 teaching guide
      • 6-8 teaching guide
      • 9-12 teaching guide
      • Undergraduate teaching guide

    • Misconceptions about evolution

    • Dealing with objections to evolution
      • Information on controversies in the public arena relating to evolution
  • Learn Evolution

Home → What’s in a range?

    What’s in a range?

    Some of David Jablonski’s most intriguing results concern the impact of geographic range on a clade’s ability to resist extinction. However, these results are complex and vary depending on whether the clade being considered is a species (a narrowly-defined group of organisms that can all interbreed) or a genus (a clade of closely related species). Here’s a quick clarification:

    Cladogram showing 3 different species in the same genus.

    • Species-level geographic range: This is the area over which an individual species lives. During times of normal background extinction, having a broad species-level geographic range is protective: genera composed of species with broad distributions are extinction resistant. However, during catastrophic mass extinctions, this trait is not particularly helpful. In that situation, having species with broad geographic ranges does not affect a genus’ risk of extinction.

    Illustration showing how three species geographic ranges that don't overlap with each other much create the larger geographic range of the genus they all belong to.

    • Genus-level geographic range: This is the total area over which a genus lives — the combined area that at least one of its species occupies. During times of normal background extinction, having a broad genus-level geographic range is protective: genera with broad distributions are extinction resistant. And, in contrast to species-level geographic range, for this trait, the same holds true during catastrophic mass extinctions: having a broad genus-level geographic range is always good for a clade’s extinction risk! Interestingly, it doesn’t matter how a genus achieves broad distribution: broadly distributed genera composed of many species with small ranges that form a large “patchwork” distribution are just as extinction resistant as broadly distributed genera composed of a few, more broadly distributed species.

    Table showing how helpful or not helpful broad species-level range versus broad genus-level range is during background extinction versus a mass extinction.

    The biggest surprise in these results is that broadly distributed genera are protected during mass extinctions (even if made up of species with small geographic ranges), but that genera with smaller geographic ranges (even if the species within them are relatively broadly distributed) are not protected. Why the difference? Why should range matter at the generic, but not the species, level? David hypothesizes that it has to do with the scale of ecosystem collapse during a mass extinction and the distribution of safe havens during that event. Perhaps, mass extinctions entail such widespread disaster and safe havens are so few and far between that even broadly-distributed species are unlikely to encounter a safe zone. Perhaps, it takes the even broader distribution of a genus before the clade stands a reasonable chance of having any one of its members wind up in a refuge.

    Footer

    Connect

    • Email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Teach

    • Teaching resource database
    • Correcting misconceptions
    • Conceptual framework and NGSS alignment
    • Image and use policy

    Learn

    • Evo 101
    • Evo in the News
    • The Tree Room
    • Browse learning resources
    • Glossary

    Copyright © 2023 · UC Museum of Paleontology Understanding Evolution · Privacy Policy